Skip to main content

Posts

Mystery in Cvent meetings

Yesterday, I sat in an interesting meeting that slowly fell to pieces: a continuation of the Analytics presentation. In fact, most Cvent meetings I attend fall apart in the same fashion. Meg was leading her team's analytics breakdown of Q3 web and business performances in North America. The team is good and their information is good. It falls apart in the delivery. Example: Jared produces data on a specific page or feature, like a navigation pane. People don't attack the data or science, which is good. They do question the decisions that created the product (like a website), which the data is highlighting. There are problems that come from the actions: Jared or Judd will make recommendations of what the content or features should do or say. And I think they should be making suggestions or considerations. Because the recommendations are taken as a Next Action, which causes fear in the room. The better questions, I think, are How did we get here and What should the futu...
Recent posts

Booz Allen lunch

Today a few of us attended a Booz Allen lunch, sponsored by AIGA and the DX team. Booz has soft launched a wonderful site: recreation.gov. This lunch was a chance for the younger team members to present their work and explain the project. The presenters were underwhelming. The director had a microphone and continued to whisper her explanations. The junior staff was non-enthusiastic. They talked a bit about the amount of work, but not about the target: the website visitor. They described four interesting topics:  Carbon Design System Microservices Atomic web design 1-week sprints My Booz friends are gushing about it on LinkedIn. Perhaps the biggest accomplishment is scraping databases across NOAA, Smithsonian, National Park Service and Feds. Incredible undertaking. Another terrific site: usaspending.gov Takeaways If  you're going to have your people lead a presentation: Wear a branded shirt Speak up Be exuberant Know more than just their stuff. Two young s...

Cvent meetings

Currently working in a Communities/Higher Logic meeting. There's a series of them: planning, brainstorming, approving and such. It's a core team: Brian, Eugene, Frank, Jodi, me. We're making large decisions quickly. Everyone in the room is pretty efficient and smart (I'm always the laggard - day 9). It's impressive and I'm noticing these essential qualities: trust and ownership. We're all talking different languages, checking in w/ one another (I mean this, you mean this, right?). We're all trusting Jodi's Higher Logic knowledge and Brian's driving the train quite well. It's the trust that's impressive. Eugene is multi-tasking, but he hears questions for him and answers right away. Cvent's got the right people. It's pretty exciting. ** addendum (2 hrs later) Communication may be the thickest hurdle in our meetings. Because we come from different places, understanding each other's lingo is ... really important. So...

Orientation - Day 2

Web Team Priorities (Frank) International site migration global website management global content re-architecture community > federated search  Challenges (Frank) Infrastructure Brand Localization inconsistencies Scalability Blogs are in Wordpress. Content managed by John Hunter Frank may pass Taxonomy to me.  digital Marketing Areas UX Web Design Web Development email: design and Production Content Strategy localizaation taxonomy IA Ops QA Marketing Enablement

Millenials

Torin, I'm starting Day 2 w/ my first blog post, on Millenials. After the first day of orientation, I noticed two things: In orientation, Millenials showed little to no work experience. More often, none. Some of the kids were college students just five months ago. Some kids were expert in some tools (Slack) and had never seen others (Zoom). One person's organization experience came from their sorority. But. They're eager sponges, looking for knowledge. I bet they're terrific learners and can mold to new structures, given good guidance. Some of them are afraid to be wrong.  Faced w/ the choice of guessing wrong or not guessing at all, some would not engage. I think some of them are afraid of being wrong in public. Here, they need to learn how to fail fast. Its OK to be wrong. Recover, learn from it and get it right the next time.